2024
Potential for Combatting IDC with the Soybean Microbiome
Contributor/Checkoff:
Category:
Sustainable Production
Keywords:
DiseaseField management Pest
Lead Principal Investigator:
Barney Geddes, North Dakota State University
Co-Principal Investigators:
Project Code:
NDSC 2024 Agr 4
Contributing Organization (Checkoff):
Leveraged Funding (Non-Checkoff):
State Board of Agricultural Research (SBARE)
Show More
Institution Funded:
Brief Project Summary:
Iron deficiency chlorosis (IDC) is a major issue faced by soybean growers. While plant genetics can play a role, most high-yielding commercial cultivars of soybeans remain sensitive to IDC. Some fertilizer products can help reduce IDC, but these are extremely expensive and rarely economically viable solutions. It is thought that the soybean microbiome represents an untapped resource to combat IDC. Microbes are capable of mobilizing iron from the soil to make it available for plants. In this project, researchers will evaluate the potential of the soybean microbiome that is recruited under IDC conditions to be harnessed as a tool to combat IDC.
Key Beneficiaries:
#agronomists, #extension specialists, #farmers
Unique Keywords:
#agronomy, #IDC, #iron deficiency chlorosis, #soybean diseases
Information And Results
Project Summary

Iron deficiency chlorosis (IDC) is a wide-spread problem strongly affecting soybean production in North Dakota. The characteristic yellowing of plant leaves suffering from IDC is caused by a lack of chlorophyll formation due to poor function of iron-requiring enzymes involved in chlorophyl biosynthesis. North Dakota soils normally contain more than enough iron for plant function, however much of the iron is not in soluble form needed by the plant. A reduction in iron solubility at high soil pHs caused by high levels of CaCO3 (lime) in the top-soil is the main cause of IDC; white the iron is there, it isn’t available to the plant. High lime soil is common in North Dakota, and IDC is exacerbated by salinity which is also becoming more and more common.
Despite a decades-long recognition of the problem, few effective solutions are available for farmers. One option involves applying iron fertilizer furrow at planting. But only red chelate fertilizers such as Soygreen (EDDHA) are effective, and these fertilizers are almost impractically expensive for most farmers at a cost of ~$18/acre at the recommended rate – which often needs to be exceeded to alleviate IDC. Some genes in soybeans that confer resistance have been identified (Mamidi et al. 2014), and varieties that incorporate these genes can help, though traits to improve IDC tolerance are often not sufficiently incorporated into commercial varieties with other desirable traits such as weed control.
The ability of microbes to solubilize iron, making insoluble iron available to the plant, has long been recognized (Crowley et al. 1988) and represents a new opportunity to combat IDC. Bacteria such as pseudomonads can release siderophore compounds which are effective in solubilizing iron and can improve the iron nutrition of plants (Vansuyt et al. 2007). Such microbes could be cultured and deployed with rhizobia as inoculants to combat IDC. Further, by isolating these microbes from North Dakota soils, the likelihood they will be persistent and effective when growers applying them in our environmental conditions would be enhanced (a “tailored inoculant” approach).
In this study we aim to build on previous work to assess the potential of the soybean microbiome as a new tool to combat IDC. In FY22, in a study that analyzed four fields in Eastern ND with varying levels of IDC, we observed a significant correlation in the structure of the soybean root and rhizosphere microbiome with the IDC level of the soil (see FY22 report). We hypothesize that unique groups of microbes that are enriched under IDC conditions could help alleviate IDC in soybeans when cultured and used as inoculants along with root nodule forming rhizobia. We have already optimized a greenhouse assay that will be suitable for measuring growth potential of microbiome members, and a plate screening assay that can identify siderophore producers (microbe-produced iron solubilizing molecules that function like Fe-chelating fertilizers). With this study we aim to utilize these resources to attempt to identify individual microbes or groups of microbes, cultures from the IDC soybean microbiome that could have a beneficial effect to soybean plants grown under IDC conditions.

Project Objectives

Objective 1) Culture a 100-member community of North Dakota microbes from the soybean microbiome.

Objective 2) Evaluate siderophore production in cultured ND soybean microbes.

Objective 3) Evaluate reduction of IDC from microbial inoculants with an optimized “Goos” Greenhouse assay.

Project Deliverables

Obj. 1) a 100-member community of microbes from the soybean microbiome will be developed, characterized and stocked at NDSU Microbiological sciences for research into reduction of IDC.

Obj. 2) Siderophore production phenotypes for each member of the collection

Obj. 3) Data for reduction of IDC from 10 microbes from the collection.

Progress Of Work

Update:
a. Research Project Title: Potential for combatting iron deficiency chlorosis with the soybean microbiome FY24.

Principle Investigator: Barney Geddes

b. Research Overview and Objectives

Iron deficiency chlorosis (IDC) is a wide-spread problem strongly affecting soybean production in North Dakota. The characteristic yellowing of plant leaves suffering from IDC is caused by a lack of chlorophyll formation due to poor function of iron-requiring enzymes involved in chlorophyl biosynthesis. North Dakota soils normally contain more than enough iron for plant function, however much of the iron is not in soluble form needed by the plant. A reduction in iron solubility at high soil pHs caused by high levels of CaCO3 (lime) in the top-soil is the main cause of IDC; white the iron is there, it isn’t available to the plant. High lime soil is common in North Dakota, and IDC is exacerbated by salinity which is also becoming more and more common.
In this study we aim to build on previous work to assess the potential of the soybean microbiome as a new tool to combat IDC. In FY22, in a study that analyzed four fields in Eastern ND with varying levels of IDC, we observed a significant correlation in the structure of the soybean root and rhizosphere microbiome with the IDC level of the soil (see FY22 report). We hypothesize that unique groups of microbes that are enriched under IDC conditions could help alleviate IDC in soybeans when cultured and used as inoculants along with root nodule forming rhizobia. We have already optimized a greenhouse assay that will be suitable for measuring growth potential of microbiome members, and a plate screening assay that can identify siderophore producers (microbe-produced iron solubilizing molecules that function like Fe-chelating fertilizers). With this study we aim to utilize these resources to attempt to identify individual microbes or groups of microbes, cultures from the IDC soybean microbiome that could have a beneficial effect to soybean plants grown under IDC conditions.

Objectives:

Objective 1) Culture a 100-member community of North Dakota microbes from the soybean microbiome.

Objective 2) Siderophore production screen from members of soybean microbial community.

Objective 3) Evaluate reduction of IDC from microbial inoculants with an optimized “Goos” Greenhouse assay.

c. Completed Work:

All objectives are still ongoing.

d. Progress of Work and Results to Date:

Objective 1) Culture a 100-member community of North Dakota microbes from the soybean microbiome.
We have successfully repeated field trials from FY22 and utilized them to perform high throughput culturomics from IDC and non-IDC fields. The Leonard location showed typical symptoms of high levels of IDC as observed in previous years and was used for the IDC field culturomics, whereas the Casselton field showed no IDC symptoms and was used as a non-IDC control. We made a slurry from roots of soybeans grown in each field, and cultured the microbiome through a dilution to extinction approach. We then used a barcoded next-generation sequencing strategy to identify the microbes that were cultured in this way. Next, identified microbes are purified and stocked in pure culture for future experimentation after a second, independent verification by sequencing their full-length 16S gene. We are currently in the process of this part of the culturing effort, and nearing completion (Table 1). In total we are aiming for 100 isolates for downstream screening and are on track to finalize such a collection. This collection will be used for Objectives 2 and 3 once finalized.

Table 1. Microbes in the process of culturing for Objective 1.

Genus Status Location
Variovorax robiniae Stocked Casselton (No IDC)
Pseudomonas silesiensis Stocked Casselton (No IDC)
Pseudomonas cerasi Stocked Casselton (No IDC)
Pseudomonas koreensis Stocked Casselton (No IDC)
Phyllobacterium ifriqiyense Stocked Casselton (No IDC)
Pseudomonas oryzihabitans Stocked Casselton (No IDC)
Lysobacter antibioticus Stocked Casselton (No IDC)
Pantoea agglomerans Stocked Casselton (No IDC)
Chryseobacterium gregarium Stocked Casselton (No IDC)
Paeniglutamicibacter sulfureus Stocked Casselton (No IDC)
Paenarthrobacter nitroguajacolicus Stocked Casselton (No IDC)
Cellulomonas cellasea Stocked Casselton (No IDC)
Variovorax paradoxus Stocked Casselton (No IDC)
Aeromicrobium ginsengisoli Stocked Casselton (No IDC)
Aeromicrobium ginsengisoli Stocked Casselton (No IDC)
Variovorax paradoxus Stocked Casselton (No IDC)
Variovorax paradoxus Stocked Casselton (No IDC)
Variovorax ureilyticus Stocked Casselton (No IDC)
Massilia agri Stocked Casselton (No IDC)
Rhodococcus qingshengii Stocked Casselton (No IDC)
Curtobacterium pusillum Stocked Casselton (No IDC)
Pseudorhodoferax soli strain TBEA3 Stocked Casselton (No IDC)
Polaromonas eurypsychrophila Stocked Casselton (No IDC)
Bacillus proteolyticus Stocked Casselton (No IDC)
Pseudarthrobacter sulfonivorans Stocked Leonard (High IDC)
Ensifer adhaerens Stocked Leonard (High IDC)
Pseudoxanthomonas japonensis Stocked Leonard (High IDC)
Cellvibrio ostraviensis Stocked Leonard (High IDC)
Pseudomonas brassicacearum Stocked Leonard (High IDC)
Hydrogenophaga intermedia Stocked Leonard (High IDC)
Ferrovibrio putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Ferrovibrio putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Ferrovibrio putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Pseudomonas putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Bosea putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Bradyrhizobium putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Asticcacaulis putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Ensifer putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Allorhizobium-Neorhizobium-Pararhizobium-Rhizobium putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Pseudoxanthomonas putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Pseudoxanthomonas putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Pseudoxanthomonas putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Pseudoxanthomonas putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Lysobacter putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Lysobacter putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Lysobacter putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Sphingobium putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Sphingopyxis putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Novosphingobium putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Sphingomonas putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Chitinophaga putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Pseudoflavitalea putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Taibaiella putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Chryseobacterium putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Dyadobacter putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Dyadobacter putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Microbacterium putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Pseudarthrobacter putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Microbacterium putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Microbacterium putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Cellulomonas putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Paenibacillus putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Agromyces putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Agromyces putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Aeromicrobium putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Rhizobacter putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Rhizobacter putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Methylibium putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Variovorax putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Variovorax putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Methylibium putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Ramlibacter putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Variovorax putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Xylophilus putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Limnohabitans putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Paucibacter putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Acidovorax putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Roseateles putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Acidovorax putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Aquincola putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Hydrogenophaga putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Massilia putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Duganella putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Microbacterium putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Mycetocola putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Pseudorhodoferax putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Hydrogenophaga putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Polaromonas putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Marmoricola putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Streptomyces putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)
Chitinophaga putatively culturable Leonard (High IDC)

e. Work to be Completed:

Objectives 2 and 3 will be performed once the complete microbial culture collection is finalized, we are on pace to complete these by June 2024.

f. Other Relevant Information:

None to add to above progress.

g. Summary:

We have made good progress culturing microbes from the soybean root and rhizosphere microbiome. Based on our previous data that soybeans recruit unique microbial communities under IDC, we hypothesize we will identify Siderophore producers from these microbes once purified, and are hopeful to attain proof-of-concept that the microbes are capable of alleviating IDC when applied to soybeans in the greenhouse.

View uploaded report PDF file

Final Project Results

Benefit To Soybean Farmers

IDC is a costly issue that causes yield loss on soybean farms. This research could yield to more affordable microbial alternatives to iron-chelating fertilizers to reduce IDC on the farm.

The United Soybean Research Retention policy will display final reports with the project once completed but working files will be purged after three years. And financial information after seven years. All pertinent information is in the final report or if you want more information, please contact the project lead at your state soybean organization or principal investigator listed on the project.