2013
Development of Branded Educational Programs to Manage and Mitigate Herbicide Resistant Weeds (1320-832-8264)
Contributor/Checkoff:
Category:
Sustainable Production
Keywords:
(none assigned)
Parent Project:
This is the first year of this project.
Lead Principal Investigator:
Bill Johnson, Purdue University
Co-Principal Investigators:
Stevan Knezevic, (not specified)
Robert Hartzler, Iowa State University
Micheal Owen, Iowa State University
Dallas Peterson, Kansas State University
Christy Sprague, Michigan State University
Richard K Zollinger, North Dakota State University
Michael Moechnig, South Dakota State University
Mark Loux, The Ohio State University
Ken Smith, University of Arkansas
Aaron Hager, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Vince Davis, University of Illinois-Carbondale
J D Green, University of Kentucky
James Martin, University of Kentucky
Kevin Bradley, University of Missouri
Larry Steckel, University of Tennessee-Institute of Agriculture
+14 More
Project Code:
1320-832-8264
Contributing Organization (Checkoff):
Institution Funded:
Brief Project Summary:

Unique Keywords:
#weed control
Information And Results
Final Project Results

Update:
1. The herbicide mode of action publication, and weeds to watch poster have been printed and each participating state is receiving approximately 1500 copies of each. Magazine advertising for the Take Action initiative is nearing completion and will be use during the late fall and winter season.
2. Bill Johnson and Kevin Bradley traveled to St. Louis in July to meet with O and B and go over the printed pieces discussed above.
3. Most of the group met in Lafayette, IN in September to discuss several different applied weed management issues including our progress on this project
4. All co-PI’s are conducted field research and demo trials this spring and summer to develop management recommendations for herbicide resistant weeds and new herbicide resistant crop technology. Field days and summer extension meetings were held in all states
5. Over 50 newsletter articles and 8 video’s were produced on the identification, biology and management of herbicide-resistant weeds.
6. Over 250 field days and extension meetings were conducted by the PI’s on herbicide resistant weeds, herbicide mode of action, herbicide application technology, and management of herbicide resistant weeds.
7. Most of the co-PI’s met in Lafayette, IN on September 10th and 11th discuss pertinent weed management issues from this past growing season and progress on this project and next steps. We decided to produce 1 page fact sheets on the identification and control of each of the weeds on the weeds to watch poster. We hope to complete these by late fall to use in winter meetings. Factsheets on waterhemp and marestail have been submitted to Osborn and Barr for formatting and printing. We hope to have the rest of the fact sheet (11 total) submitted and printed January. We are also developing a pigweed identification poster and hope to have that printed for use during the winter meetings.

In summary, after year one of this project, we feel that our major accomplishments include the following:
1) Development of branded messages with the “Take Action” logo and 4 pillars. Our next step is to deliver the message to farmers through our activities and the activities of our cooperators with the basic manufacturers.
2) Development of a herbicide mode of action chart for the major agronomic crops of the Midwest and Southern U.S. soybean growing regions. Our next step is to deliver to growers and teach them how to use it.
3) Development of the “Eleven that Threaten” poster regarding the worst herbicide resistant weeds, which includes images and the sites of action that the individual weeds are resistant too.
4) We feel that we have increased awareness of herbicide-resistant weed issues and the need to rotate herbicide sites of action.
5) We have effectively leveraged USB funds as evidenced by the number of meetings, field days, diagnostic training events, and applied research trials conducted in cooperation with industry and University Extension. A conservative estimate is that USB funds were leveraged approximately 1:1 based on conservative estimates of Co-Pi’s.

The United Soybean Research Retention policy will display final reports with the project once completed but working files will be purged after three years. And financial information after seven years. All pertinent information is in the final report or if you want more information, please contact the project lead at your state soybean organization or principal investigator listed on the project.