2017
Evaluation of Soybean Cyst Nematode Seed Treatments
Home
Contributor/Checkoff:
North Dakota Soybean Council
Category:
Sustainable Production
Keywords:
NematodePest
Parent Project:
This is the first year of this project.
Lead Principal Investigator:
Samuel Markell, North Dakota State University
Co-Principal Investigators:
Ted Helms, North Dakota State University
Guiping Yan, North Dakota State University
+1 More
Project Code:
Contributing Organization (Checkoff):
North Dakota Soybean Council
$17,136
Leveraged Funding (Non-Checkoff):
State Board of Ag Research and Education is contributing $13,371.00
Show More
Institution Funded:
North Dakota State University
$17,136
Brief Project Summary:

Soybean cyst nematode is primarily managed by genetic resistance and crop rotation. However, several nematicide seed treatment products have recently been developed, notably; Avicta and Clariva by Syngenta Crop Protection and Poncho VOTiVO and ILeVO by Bayer Crop Science. Avicta and VOTiVO have been widely tested across North Central states in the last four years, with mixed results. However, Clariva and ILeVO are newer to the market, and relatively little public data exists. Other products, developed or advertised by smaller companies such as NHibit by Plant Health Care industries are also on the market. We propose to establish field trials at four SCN-infected locations to test...

Unique Keywords:
#nematodes
Information And Results
Final Project Results

Update:

View uploaded report Word file

2016-2017 Executive Summary
June 30, 2017
Evaluation of Soybean Cyst Nematode Seed Treatments

PI: Sam Markell, Ph.D.
Co-PI’s: Ted Helms, Ph.D. and Guiping Yan, Ph.D.

What is the objective of this project?
The goal of this project is to evaluate the efficacy of nematicide seed treatments for the soybean cyst nematode.
Why is this research important to farmers?

Soybean Cyst Nematode (SCN) is the most important yield-limiting disease threat to soybean production in the United States. SCN is a parasitic worm that lives and reproduces on soybean roots, severely stresses plants, and can cause very high yield loss. In 2003, SCN was found in North Dakota for the first time, and has continued to spread throughout the state.

Management tools are available which include resistant varieties, good crop rotation strategies, and, possibly, nematicide seed treatments. Nematicide seed treatments may provide an additional management tool to manage SCN, especially in situations where very high egg levels exist or the nematode is beginning to overcome the resistance in PI88788. While the pathogen is still managed by PI88788 in the vast majority of ND, we do have areas of very high egg levels.
However, before growers use these, it is important to evaluate the seed treatment products locally. One of the primary seed treatments is a biological (Clariva), which is likely sensitive to local environments. Importantly, if the seed treatment products do not effectively manage SCN in our environment, it is important that growers do not incur this extra input cost.

How is this project conducted?
Eight SCN seed treatment trials were established in four fields with high egg levels (as determined by 2015 fall sampling) near Wyndmere, Absaraka, Prosper, and Galesburg. Syngenta and Bayer products were evaluated in separate but adjacent trials. All SCN seed treatment trials were planted in a randomized complete block design. Plots were initially planted in 22 feet row lengths by 10 feet wide. After allies were cut, total plot area was 14 feet long by 10 feet wide. The 2016 trials in Wyndmere, Absaraka, Prosper, and Galesburg were planted on May 7, May 9, May 8, and May 6, respectively, and harvested on October 2, October 3, October 13, and October 8, respectively.
To determine early season and harvest egg levels, ten oil cores were taken from the center two rows of each soybean plot using a one inch soil probe, approximately two inches from the plant stems. Samples were mixed, bagged, kept cool and brought to the NDSU diagnostic laboratory for assessment. Total number of cysts on root were evaluated by arbitrarily extracting ten plants per plot. Plants were cleaned gently with water and cysts were visually counted. Additional diseases were evaluated visually, including Sudden Death Syndrome (SDS) and Brown Stem Rot (BSR).

What are the results?
In each location, egg levels were relatively low, which was likely due to a relatively unfavorable season for SCN development. Relatively low egg levels made it difficult to separate treatments. However, statistical differences in some measures at some locations were observed. Early phytotoxicity was observed with ILeVO treatments, but it was limited to cotyledons and was not observed by the second evaluation. This was not surprising, as ILeVO is known to express a ‘halo effect’ on cotyledon edges. Sudden Death Syndrome and Brown Stem Rot were not observed. Although statistical differences in yield were not found, treatments with a nematicide generally had a numerically higher yield than the standard base packages. Evaluation of these seed treatments in future years will be critical to assess their efficacy, particularly in a higher disease pressure environment.

The United Soybean Research Retention policy will display final reports with the project once completed but working files will be purged after three years. And financial information after seven years. All pertinent information is in the final report or if you want more information, please contact the project lead at your state soybean organization or principal investigator listed on the project.