2021
Development of Genetic, Chemical and Population-Based Tactics to Manage Key Kansas Soybean Insect Pests
Contributor/Checkoff:
Category:
Sustainable Production
Keywords:
Biotic stressCrop protectionField management Pest
Lead Principal Investigator:
Brian McCornack, Kansas State University
Co-Principal Investigators:
Project Code:
2126
Contributing Organization (Checkoff):
Institution Funded:
Brief Project Summary:
This project evaluates current strategies while assessing new methods for managing defoliators, seed-chewers, and other soybean yield-reducing pests. This project plans to update current spray recommendations to optimize efficacy of newer chemistries including biological insecticides that target soybean stem borer, defoliators, and/or soybean podworms. Researchers will determine the economic value of reducing insecticide coverage while mitigating losses by key soybean pests, primarily defoliators and pod-feeding insects. Researchers will determine the extent of measured insect defoliation in soybean fields compared with established economic thresholds, characterize spatial patterns of insect defoliation, and compare visual estimates of soybean defoliation with actual % defoliation as measured by image analysis.
Key Beneficiaries:
#ag retailers, #applicators, #entomologists, #extension specialists, #farmers
Unique Keywords:
#economics, #insecticides, #insects and pests, #soybean pests
Information And Results
Project Summary

Previous research has identified Dectes stem borer resistance in plant introduction PI165673 and has shown that if a cultivar containing PI165673 resistance can be developed it will greatly benefit Kansas producers (Aguirre-Rojas 2013). In addition, the insect RNAi gene silencing technique is effective against other agronomic pests and using gene silencing is new viable way to create stem borer-resistant plants and this projects evaluates such transgenic plants under greenhouse and field conditions. Host plant resistance is one strategy to combating key pests impacting soybean in Kansas. This project also aims to address more immediate needs to issues faced by Kansas growers. Best management practices are founded in integrative strategies. Sampling for key pests is also rooted in the understanding of factors affecting their distribution within and between fields. Therefore, this project evaluates current strategies while assessing the value of new methods for managing defoliators, seed-chewers, and other yield-reducing pests. Previous work by this group demonstrated that adult colonization patterns vary between fields and through time and need to be better predicted. This project plans to devise and update current spray recommendations to optimize efficacy of newer chemistries including biological insecticides that target soybean stem borer, defoliators, and/or soybean podworms. In addition, research is needed to determine the economic value of reducing insecticide coverage while mitigating losses by key pests in Kansas soybean, primarily defoliators and pod-feeding insects. In conjunction with multi-state collaborations, we plan to determine the extent of measured insect defoliation in commercial soybean fields compared with established economic thresholds, characterize spatial patterns of insect defoliation in commercial soybean fields specific to Kansas, and compare visual estimates of soybean defoliation with actual % defoliation as measured by image analysis.

Project Objectives

Objective 1. Create soybean plants resistant to soybean stem borer by inserting borer RNA into soybean plants to interfere (RNAi) with genes necessary for borer survival.

Objective 2. Improve insecticide efficacy by using host plant and other environmental cues or conditions to adjust timing and placement of application.

Objective 3: Expand web pages and other educational materials associated with soybean insects.

Project Deliverables

Progress Of Work

Update:
Objective 1. Experiments to silence the Lac2 cuticle gene of stemborer larvae with RNAi injected into larvae were completed in FY18 and FY19. Preliminary results with dsRNA-covered artificial diet indicate that silencing Lac2 both delays larval pupation and kills adult beetles; however, it is not known whether such effects can be repeated in developing soybean. This summer we conducted greenhouse studies using mesh exclusion cages infested with Dectes stem borer collected from soybean and giant ragweed near Ashland bottoms. Transgenic-soybean seeds developed in Dr. Harold Trick’s lab at KSU were grown in the greenhouse in large pots and were infested with 8 mating pairs of Dectes from field collections over the course of 3 weeks. Ovipositional scars were recorded two weeks post infestation and in late-reproductive stages plants were dissected and number of developing Dectes larvae were counted. Data are still being analyzed. These data will be used to evaluate stemborer resistance in transgenic soybean expressing Lac2 and Chitin synthase II dsRNA and will direct future field-based studies aimed at determining whether these plants with silenced larval genes slow larval development and/or kill larvae. Land has been identified and a permit for planting transgenic soybean at the Agronomy North Farm is still pending. We are hopeful that we will receive approval to plant a field study to evaluate these transgenic lines using naturally occurring Dectes stem borer populations.

Objective 2. Soybean podworm (Helicoverpa zea) trapping data was further analyzed to explore potential uses for modeling insect severity given location and time of year within Kanas. The the best model for predicting the total number of moths was the model that included the interaction between all variables as it resulted in the lowest AIC values (AIC: 5549.4). Further analysis revealed that location was not a sufficient variable to model the data alone since there was such diversity in the number of different sites and knowing one site does not allow a model to predict what will happen at any new site. The best model for predicting future values of total moths was the negative binomial regression, which takes into account the hour of the day. However, due to the observation that moths are only active at night, all of the analyses with only nighttime data needed to be repeated to investigate whether the time of the night was still a good predictor of moth activity. For predicting the average number of moths, a stepwise linear function was used to predict and model the average number of moths per hour, location, or at a given temperature. The best model for predicting the average number of moths was using only time of day once again. The figure below shows the average number of moths across all hours of the day. The points indicate the average number of moths per location, and the blue line indicates the model prediction with the grey area showing the range of 2 standard deviations from the mean. This model had the lowest mean root squared error of 2.12849. Looking at only nighttime data, the best model for predicting future total moth counts was a negative binomial model that took into account both time of day and the average temperature since it had the lowest AIC value of 5923.6. After creating a model to predict total moth counts, a stepwise linear function was created to predict average moth counts during the nighttime hours. The best model for predicting average number of moths at night was location and time of night. Therefore, even without the extreme difference between the day and night that we saw before, the time of night still had a significant effect on the number of moths. Further analyses are being conducted and will be included in the final report.

Models to accurately estimate soybean defoliation using machine learning were updated and tested using images collected from transects in naturally infested soybean fields in central Kansas. Various feature extraction architectures and performances comparisons are still being conducted and a manuscript is under preparation. Some examples of these architectures included VGG19, VGG20, ResNet50, and ResNet101, etc. Future applications from this work would include implementing this concept in real-time on a smartphone to get rapid detection and defoliation classification estimates for making in-field application decisions. Obtaining this information in situ could prove valuable for researchers and soybean growers alike.

Objective 3. Decision guides were updated for 2021 and can be found at: http://www.ksre. ksu.edu/bookstore/pubs/Mf743.pdf. Work is ongoing to update the insect pest management information section for the Kansas Soybean Management 2021 publication. New information was added in our soybean pest management web-based decision chemical selection tool in myFields.info (https://www.myfields.info/chemical/selector/search) and discussed during field days, radio programs, newsletters, and via other educational opportunities as appropriate. For a list of all soybean pests and associated management guides on myFields.info, visit http:// myfields.info/pests.

Final Project Results

Update:
Objective 1. Experiments to silence the Lac2 cuticle gene of stemborer larvae with RNAi injected into larvae were completed in FY18 and FY19. Preliminary results with dsRNA-covered artificial diet indicate that silencing Lac2 both delays larval pupation and kills adult beetles; however, it is not known whether such effects can be repeated in developing soybean. This summer we conducted greenhouse studies using mesh exclusion cages infested with Dectes stem borer collected from soybean and giant ragweed near Ashland bottoms. Transgenic-soybean seeds developed in Dr. Harold Trick’s lab at KSU were grown in the greenhouse in large pots and were infested with 8 mating pairs of Dectes from field collections over the course of 3 weeks. Ovipositional scars were recorded two weeks post infestation and in late-reproductive stages plants were dissected and number of developing Dectes larvae were counted. Results from the greenhouse infestations were inconclusive. There was significant Dectes ovipositon pressure across several of the cages, but heat and other environmental stressors likely contributed to the low number of tunnels observed in the artificial infestations. The trial will continue but under field conditions using natural populations, as this will give us the best indication as to whether the RNAi event will show promise in controlling this annual pest.

Objective 2. Soybean podworm (Helicoverpa zea) trapping data was further analyzed to explore potential uses for modeling insect severity given location and time of year within Kanas. The the best model for predicting the total number of moths was the model that included the interaction between all variables as it resulted in the lowest AIC values (AIC: 5549.4). Further analysis revealed that location was not a sufficient variable to model the data alone since there was such diversity in the number of different sites and knowing one site does not allow a model to predict what will happen at any new site. The best model for predicting future values of total moths was the negative binomial regression, which takes into account the hour of the day. However, due to the observation that moths are only active at night, all of the analyses with only nighttime data needed to be repeated to investigate whether the time of the night was still a good predictor of moth activity. For predicting the average number of moths, a stepwise linear function was used to predict and model the average number of moths per hour, location, or at a given temperature. The best model for predicting the average number of moths was using only time of day once again. Looking at only nighttime data, the best model for predicting future total moth counts was a negative binomial model that took into account both time of day and the average temperature since it had the lowest AIC value of 5923.6. After creating a model to predict total moth counts, a stepwise linear function was created to predict average moth counts during the nighttime hours. The best model for predicting average number of moths at night was location and time of night. Therefore, even without the extreme difference between the day and night that we saw before, the time of night still had a significant effect on the number of moths. Further analyses are being conducted and will be included in the final report.

Models to accurately estimate soybean defoliation using machine learning were updated and tested using images collected from transects in naturally infested soybean fields in central Kansas; manuscript has been submitted and awaiting peer review. Various feature extraction architectures and performances comparisons are still being conducted and a manuscript is under preparation. Some examples of these architectures included VGG19, VGG20, ResNet50, and ResNet101, etc. Future applications from this work would include implementing this concept in real-time on a smartphone to get rapid detection and defoliation classification estimates for making in-field application decisions. Obtaining this information in situ could prove valuable for researchers and soybean growers alike.

In addition, 25 fields were sampled in northeast Kansas to evaluate the presence of soybean gall midge, an emerging pests across much of the Midwest. No records have been detected to date, but agents and growers were trained on how to scout for this pest and encouraged to report to state specialists. Efforts to better understand the distribution of this new pest will continue in the coming years, as this pest has the potential to impact soybean production in the northeast corner of the state.

Objective 3. Decision guides were updated for 2022 and can be found at: http://www.ksre. ksu.edu/bookstore/pubs/Mf743.pdf. Work is ongoing to update the insect pest management information section for the Kansas Soybean Management 2022 publication. New information was added in our soybean pest management web-based decision chemical selection tool in myFields.info (https://www.myfields.info/chemical/selector/search) and discussed during field days, radio programs, newsletters, and via other educational opportunities as appropriate. For a list of all soybean pests and associated management guides on myFields.info, visit http:// myfields.info/pests.

Dectes stem borer continues to expand its range and impact on soybean production across much of central to eastern Kansas. It is imperative that effective management strategies be developed for this pest that are cost effective. Insecticides are not always a viable option because the emergence window for this pest is quite big. Incorporating host plant resistance is a more selective way to reduce Dectes stem borers in commercial fields, since the plant will be producing toxins that will directly affect the developing larvae, which are hard to target using foliar insecticide applications. Dectes stem borer are not the only pest that Kansas soybean farmers must manage. Soybean podworm is another annual pest that affects acres in several regions within the state. Predicting where this pest will be a problem can help soybean growers and consultants manage their time more efficiently. Results from this work will feed into a predictive model to alert registered users within www.myfields.info of potential flights within a given county. In addition, defoliating pests have become more of an issue in recent years; however, it is not known whether 30+ year old thresholds are still relevant for making informed decisions. There is also a need to streamline field assessments by making effective use of new technologies like machine learning. Consequently, we developed a model that is capable of detecting infested leaves that are captured through the use of a drone or small unmanned aircraft system.

Benefit To Soybean Farmers

The United Soybean Research Retention policy will display final reports with the project once completed but working files will be purged after three years. And financial information after seven years. All pertinent information is in the final report or if you want more information, please contact the project lead at your state soybean organization or principal investigator listed on the project.