2021
Mitigating Soybean Root and Seedling Diseases in Kansas
Contributor/Checkoff:
Category:
Sustainable Production
Keywords:
Crop protectionDiseaseField management
Parent Project:
This is the first year of this project.
Lead Principal Investigator:
Christopher Little, Kansas State University
Co-Principal Investigators:
Project Code:
2148
Contributing Organization (Checkoff):
Institution Funded:
Brief Project Summary:
The first objective in this project is to discover resistance to fungal pathogens in SDS, Fusarium diseases, and charcoal rot. Genetic resistance in these diseases occur using different mechanisms, but varieties exist that exhibit moderate resistance. A catalog of varietal resistance will be required to integrate quantitative traits into breeding materials. The second objective is to evaluate management strategies for fungal pathogen control. Our research demonstrated that high-glucosinolate mustard reduces M. phaseolina in soybeans. However, it has not been tested to control SDS or other Fusarium spp. The third objective is to assess the impact of re-emerging root pathogens in southeastern Kansas.
Key Beneficiaries:
#biologists, #breeders, #farmers
Unique Keywords:
#breeding and genetics, #charcoal rot, #fusarium, #soybean diseases
Information And Results
Project Summary

Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) is a host of Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid., the necrotrophic ascomycete fungus that causes damping-off, seedling blight, collar, stem and root rot, and charcoal rot. In addition to soybean, M. phaseolina causes economic losses on sesame (Sesamum indicum L.), safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.), sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.), and more than 500 cultivated and wild plant species in 75 families (Twizeyimana et al., 2012, Gupta et al., 2012). In the United States, charcoal rot is the third most damaging soybean disease in terms of yield loss after soybean cyst nematode and seedling diseases. Average yield losses to this disease totaled 219.6 million bushels from 2010 to 2014 across 28 soybean-producing states (Allen et al., 2017). In Kansas, yield losses averaged 4.3% from 2010 to 2018, which ranged from an estimated 150,000 bu lost in 2015 (0.1%) to 15.5 million bu lost in 2012 (15.0%)

Resistance or tolerance in host plants is the best management strategy to reduce infection and damage from charcoal rot, although only a few reliable resistance sources have been found. Genetic resistance to SDS, Fusarium diseases, and charcoal rot occurs using different mechanisms, but varieties exist that exhibit moderate resistance or tolerance to these diseases. Ultimately, a catalog of varietal resistance will be required to integrate these (largely) quantitative traits into materials that can be released from the Kansas breeding program.

Otherwise, well-studied cultural management strategies that have been employed include controlling plant populations and weeds to reduce stress (Bowen and Schapaugh, 1989), crop rotation to non-host cereals to reduce soil M. phaseolina populations (Mueller et al., 1985), balancing soil fertility and phosphorus management to improve yield under pathogen pressure (Gupta et al., 2012), using no-till as a way to conserve moisture and reduce soil temperatures (Mengistu et al., 2009), and irrigation management in systems where relevant or practical (Cruz, 2011; Gupta et al., 2012).

Our research has demonstrated the of high-glucosinolate mustard as a cover crop reduces M. phaseolina populations in soybean plants and soil (Sassenrath et al., 2017). However, no such studies have been done to test the effect of this cover crop plant for control of SDS or other Fusarium spp. that cause root and seedling diseases. Many plants produce biofumigant chemicals that control or reduce harmful soil fungi, including M. phaseolina. For example, Mengistu et al. (2009) showed some suppression of charcoal rot infestation with reduced tillage and use of rye (Secale cereale L.) as a cover crop. Plants in the Brassicaceae family produce a type of biofumigant that has been used to control fungal soil-borne pathogens (Matthiessen and Kirkegaard, 2006). Some Brassica cover crops such as Brassica juncea L. release aliphatic and aromatic secondary metabolites, including various glucosinolates, whose breakdown products are potentially inhibitory to plant pathogens, promote shifts in the soil microbial community, and enhance nutrient cycling (Bones and Rossiter, 1996; Matthiessen and Kirkegaard, 2006; Weerakoon et al., 2012). Glucosinolates are sulfur-rich compounds that are broken down or transformed in the soil by the resident microbial community into isothiocyanates (ITCs). These compounds exhibit broad toxicity against many organisms due to their sulfur-rich content and high reactivity (Bones and Rossiter, 1996; Rask et al., 2000).

Fluopyram is the active ingredient in ILeVo brand seed treatments and has been shown to be highly effective against SDS disease and nematodes in the rhizosphere of soybean. Fusarium virguiliforme has been shown in direct to tests to be sensitive to this compound, although some fungicide tolerance existed in the pathogen population tested (Wang et al., 2017). Fortunately, Kansas F. virguiliforme isolates showed some of the lowest tolerance to fluopyram. Some research has been conducted to test the efficacy of this anti-fungal against various fungi in other crops. However, few studies have examined the effect of this a.i. against other Fusarium spp. that attack soybean seedling or roots, or the effect against charcoal rot.

The 2020 field season saw a notable spike in Phytophthora root rot incidence in southeastern soybean production areas. Over the years, this pathogen has appeared occasionally in the eastern part of the state with the greatest impacts observed in the north-eastern counties. However, the appearance of Phytophthora sojae in the warmer SE counties signals a potential pathogen shift or a change in the genetics of the varieties in the maturity groups used in the southern part of the state.

Project Objectives

(1) Discover resistance to fungal pathogens: SDS, Fusarium diseases, and charcoal rot.
(2) Evaluate management strategies for fungal pathogens: SDS, Fusarium diseases, and charcoal rot.
(3) Assess the impact of re-emerging root pathogens: Phytophthora sojae in southeastern Kansas.

Project Deliverables

(1) Identification of breeding lines, PIs, and commercial varieties with resistance to SDS, Fusarium root rot/seedling disease, and charcoal rot.
(2) Determine the effectiveness of management strategies, esp. the use of Brassica juncea cover crops on SDS and Fusarium root and seedling disease control.
(3) Develop a SEK Phyotophthora sojae that can be evaluated.
(4) Results obtained during the proposed studies (and subsequently repeated experiments) will be published in recognized scholarly journals.
(5) Useful information from these studies will be incorporated into future Kansas Research and Extension publications such as new and revised plant pathology fact sheet(s), new and/or revised crop production support guide(s), and Agronomy eUpdates.
(6) We will communicate these results to producers and stakeholders when extension personnel associated with the Department of Plant Pathology and KSRE that give presentations, training sessions and field days.
(7) Results will also be communicated on a regular basis on the K-State Radio Network program, Agriculture Today.

Progress Of Work

Update:
A core team of investigators exists at Kansas State University that can work together to address the long-term research and discovery needs of soybean stakeholders in the state. This group is tentatively named the "K-State Soybean Root Health Working Group."

Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) is a host to a range of seedling and root diseases. Average yield losses to SDS, Fusarium diseases, charcoal rot, and Phytophthora root rot totaled 895.4 million bushels from 2010 to 2014 across 28 soybean-producing states (Allen et al., 2017). In Kansas, yield total losses/year averaged 7.8% from 2012 to 2021, with a high of 15.99 Mbu lost in 2012 (19.1%) to these diseases.

A range of practical control strategies exist for controlling soybean diseases (Table 1; attachment). Resistance or tolerance in host plants is the best management strategy to reduce infection and damage from disease, although success of finding good varieties varies depending on the disease. Genetic resistance to SDS, Fusarium diseases, and charcoal rot occurs using different mechanisms, but varieties exist that exhibit moderate resistance or tolerance to these diseases. Ultimately, a catalog of varietal resistance will be required to integrate these (largely) quantitative traits into materials that can be released from the Kansas State breeding program.

SDS screening has been conducted for numerous KS breeding entries, public, and commercial varieties. Consistent responses between pathogenicity assays are not observed for all entries. However, K16-1690 consistently had among the highest disease severity values across assays (Figure 1; attachment).

A priority has been the assessment of fungicide active ingredients for control of important Fusarium spp. that cause seedling disease and Fusarium root rot. Figure 2 (attachment) shows the results of fungicide screening assays for soybean isolates of F. proliferatum and F. virguliforme. As shown, azoxystrobin required more active ingredient than pyraclostrobin or picoxystrobin to reduce Fusarium growth.

Finally, screening for charcoal rot resistance has taken many forms through a range of pathogenicity assays. Of particular interest, is the seed-plate assay, which can be used to screen large numbers of germplasm (Figure 3; attachment). Seed germination and hypocotyl length provide quantitative measures for comparison of soybean genotype resistance to Macrophomina phaseolina.

View uploaded report PDF file

Final Project Results

Update:
See Final Report attached as a PDF.

View uploaded report PDF file

Benefit To Soybean Farmers

The United Soybean Research Retention policy will display final reports with the project once completed but working files will be purged after three years. And financial information after seven years. All pertinent information is in the final report or if you want more information, please contact the project lead at your state soybean organization or principal investigator listed on the project.