Updated April 3, 2025:
View uploaded report 
This study explored how soil texture (sand, silt, and clay) affects nutrient availability in Delaware coastal plain soils, which can vary due to topographic differences. Sandy soils, possibly remnants of old sand dunes in this area, generally have lower nutrient retention capacity. These soils are more prone to nutrient leaching and may require more frequent fertilization to maintain adequate nutrient levels. In contrast, soils with more silt and clay, typically found in lower areas or depressions, have a better ability to retain nutrients, providing a more stable environment for plant growth.
These lower landscape positions may have higher clay content due to erosion, deposition, or weathering from greater water presence. As a result, these areas also contained higher amounts of aluminum (Al) and organic matter, both associated with clay and lower landscape positions. As expected, pH and buffer pH were linked to clay content across the field, where clay's higher buffering capacity typically leads to more acidic conditions.
Silt-rich soils may have originated from loess, which also contributes to better nutrient retention. Micronutrients like manganese and copper were more available in finer soils (silt and clay) due to their higher nutrient-holding capacity. These micronutrients may also be related to the parent material itself, further enhancing micronutrient content. Zinc, however, did not show a clear relationship with soil texture, suggesting that other factors, such as past management practices, could influence its availability.
Understanding how soil texture, elevation, and parent material affect nutrient availability can help farmers optimize fertilization practices, manage pH levels, and improve overall soil health. This knowledge can lead to better crop productivity and more sustainable farming practices.