Updated January 2, 2025:
Evaluating Soybean Yield Response to In-Furrow & Foliar Biologicals
Final Report
Principle Investigator: James Adkins -UD
Abstract:
Research across the U.S. has shown that biological products may enhance plant function and improve corn yields in specific soil types. Similarly, applications of carbon and other microbe “food sources” are theorized to stimulate native soil biology and produce comparable yield gains. This study evaluated the yield impacts of in-furrow and foliar-applied biological and supplemental products in coastal plain soils. Eight products(one with varied application timings) for a total of 10 treatments were tested in randomized 600-foot strips using a 6-row JD 7200 planter equipped with an in-furrow liquid application system. No statistically significant yield differences were observed in the rainfed or irrigated plots.
Procedure:
This study assessed the effects of soil biology-enhancing products on soybean yields under controlled conditions at the University of Delaware’s Warrington Irrigation Research Farm. Products were tested in replicated blocks with irrigation rates applied perpendicular to planting patterns (Images 1 & 2). Uniform inputs were used across the study, with variations limited to biological product applications. A Gleaner K2 combine with a Harvest Master system was used to collect plot weights, moisture, and test weight data from 270 plots under lateral move overhead irrigation (Image 3). The plots were no till planted behind last year's corn crop without cover crops.
Image 1: Infurrow product randomization Image 2: Perpendicular 90’ Irrigation Zones
Table 1. Field Operations, nutrient and pesticide applications.
April 24 VRT Dry Spread Potash & MAP 0-315lbs/a
May 16 Pre-emerge Herbicide Broadaxe & Metribuzin 22 oz/ac
June 12 Plant 6 row JD 7200 Axis 4513E 140k seeds/a
June 19 Post Emerge Herbicide Gly & Liberty 32 oz/a
June 19 Early Foliar Application Terramar + Radiate 1 qt/a
July 2 Late Foliar Application Terramar + Radiate 1 qt/a
Oct 7 Corn Harvest Gleaner K2
Image 3: 2024 Harvest of 270 Biological Plots Image 4: Aug 23 Imagery showing Irrigation
Results:
Figure 1. Soybean Yield by Treatment Figure 2. Soybean Yields by Irrigation
Note: Yield differences not statistically significant. Note: 28.7 bu/a Rainfed vs 71.7 bu/a Irrigated
Figure 3. Irrigated Yield by Product
Figure 4. Rainfed Yield by Product
The 2024 season was unusually dry requiring a total of 10.5 inches of irrigation from May 24 through September 20th. The rainfed plots were extremely stressed with dramatic differences in NDVI values between the irrigated and non-irrigated areas in the weekly aerial imagery. No differences were distinguishable between the individual products at any point throughout the season.
Conclusions:
This study demonstrated no yield benefit from using biological products under the tested conditions. Although none of the products hurt yields, none of the products showed a statistically significant impact on yield. Given these findings, farmers are unlikely to achieve positive returns from these products, even if they are cost-free. Results suggest that the efficacy of biological enhancements remains highly dependent on specific environmental conditions and cannot be generalized across broader applications.
This study demonstrated no yield benefit from using biological products under the tested conditions. Although none of the products hurt yields, none of the products showed a statistically significant impact on yield. Given these findings, farmers are unlikely to achieve positive returns from these products, even if they are cost-free. Results suggest that the efficacy of biological enhancements remains highly dependent on specific environmental conditions and cannot be generalized across broader applications.