2019
Potential use of cover crops and green manures for localized or widespread management of Fusarium diseases, white mold and iron deficiency chlorosis on soybean
Contributor/Checkoff:
Category:
Sustainable Production
Keywords:
Crop protectionDiseaseField management
Lead Principal Investigator:
Leonor Leandro, Iowa State University
Co-Principal Investigators:
Daren Mueller, Iowa State University
Project Code:
450-49-10
Contributing Organization (Checkoff):
Leveraged Funding (Non-Checkoff):
AFRI-NIFA Foundational (PI Leandro) ‘Unraveling The Mechanisms Underlying Beneficial Impacts Of Diversified Cropping Systems On Pest Management, Soil Health And Plant Productivity’- this project studies the effects of crop rotations and compost on SDS and the microbiome. It includes field and greenhouse trials testing if oat spring and fall crops suppress SDS.
Show More
Institution Funded:
Brief Project Summary:

Soybean yield is compromised by many diseases, including sudden death syndrome, white mold and Fusarium root rot, and the soil-associated disorder iron deficiency chlorosis. Cover crops can improve soil conditions and affect crop health. They may make the environment more or less favorable for pathogen reproduction and survival. Cover crops may also produce antimicrobial compounds that inhibit pathogen growth and survival. In contrast, cover crop species may be susceptible to soybean pathogens and increase inoculum density and disease risk. To test the effect of cover crops on SDS and Fusarium root rot disease development, this work investigates how cover crops affect disease development in greenhouse and field conditions. The goal is to investigate the potential use of cover crops and green manures as tools to manage important soil-associated diseases of soybean.

Key Benefactors:
farmers, agronomists, Extension agents

Information And Results
Final Project Results

Update:
More growers are utilizing cover crops in the Midwest, but the impact of cover crop practices on plant diseases is poorly understood. Cover crop plantings can alter soil moisture levels and microbial communities, and consequently may influence the development of soil-borne diseases. Sudden death syndrome (SDS) and iron deficiency chlorosis (IDC) are soil-borne diseases that affect soybean production in Iowa. In the North Central region, fall-sown rye and wheat are two winter-hardy options growers can use for erosion and weed control outside of the growing season. Research in Minnesota has shown that oats, sown as a nurse crop in the spring, can mitigate IDC symptoms in soybean by taking up excess soil moisture and nitrates. In 2019, we conducted field experiments to evaluate the effects of winter rye, winter wheat, and nurse-crop oat cover crops on development of SDS, IDC, and soybean yield. We also conducted greenhouse and lab experiments to determine how cover crops affect disease development and pathogen growth. In addition, we sampled grower fields with tile drainage system to determine if disease pressure is affected by the location of the tile lines.

Objective 1. Evaluate the effect of cover crops and green manures on SDS, Fusarium root rot, white mold and iron deficiency chlorosis in field conditions

In 2019, we collected data from 5 fields in Iowa. Winter rye and winter wheat seed drilled late in Fall 2018 emerged early in spring 2019; oats drilled late in Fall 2018 did not emerge. Oats and rye were also established as companion crops when soybeans were planted in Spring 2019. Two soybean varieties were planted at all 5 locations: Asgrow AG2733 (susceptible to iron deficiency chlorosis (IDC) and sudden death syndrome (SDS)) and Asgrow 28X9 (tolerant to both diseases). Cover crops were terminated when soybeans reached the V3 growth stage. We collected data on cover crop biomass, soil moisture, and soybean stand at 4 of the 5 locations. Iron chlorosis and SDS symptoms were assessed throughout the growing season. White mold incidence and severity were evaluated at growth stage R6. Symptoms from the three target diseases were not severe in the 2019 growing season. Both IDC locations had plants with SDS. Soybeans were harvested in late Fall due to excessive moisture in the soil. In general, disease pressure was very low in all trials, probably due to the unusual weather conditions in 2019. Rainfall was slightly below average in June and August, but higher than average in July and September. Detailed results are shown below for the three locations of the study.

Kanawha, Iowa
Two field locations were selected at the ISU Northern Iowa Research Farm in Kanawha. More cover crop biomass was produced before termination in the fall-sown treatments than in the spring-sown oats (data not shown). IDC symptoms were observed at low levels in the field with a history of IDC, but there were no treatment differences in IDC disease severity or yield for either variety. SDS foliar disease symptoms developed late in the growing season at both locations. SDS incidence was very low (0.1 to 6.7% of plants) in the SDS-tolerant AG28X9, and ranged from 5.3 to 16.3% in subplots with the moderately-susceptible AG2733. Within each variety, there were no treatment differences in SDS disease incidence or disease index at either location. At the SDS location, AG28X9 plots without cover crops had higher yields than plots with cover crops, but yields for all four treatments were similar at the IDC location. Yields for AG2733 were not affected by treatment at either location.

Ames, Iowa
Two field locations were selected in central Iowa in 2019 (ISU Curtiss Farm & Hinds Farm). Curtiss farm was selected due to previous fields having a history of IDC and SDS, while Hinds farm had a history of SDS. In general, Hinds farm had very low disease pressure in both varieties ranging from (0 to 0.4% of plants) in the moderately-susceptible AG2733 and nearly 0% infected plants in the SDS-tolerant AG28x9. Curtiss farm had higher disease incidence levels in the moderately-susceptible variety (18.3 to 36.2% of plants) and in the SDS-tolerant variety (1.8 to 3.7% of plants). Regardless, there was no treatment difference on SDS at either location. IDC at the Curtiss farm was low (1.9 to 2.1% of plants) for both varieties. Yield at the Curtiss farm for the no cover crop treatment was higher in the AG2733 variety whereas fall wheat was the highest yielding plot in AG28x9. Regardless, there was no significant difference among treatments at this location. Yields at the Hinds farm had some differences (P=0.019) for the AG2733 variety and (P=0.55) for the AG28x9 variety. These differences in yield may be due to environmental factors such as sandy soil and the lack of irrigation.

Nashua, Iowa
One field experiment was established in northeast Iowa at the Nashua Research Farm to test cover crop impact on white mold. Disease scoring was conducted on a 0-3 scale with a select number of plants: 0 = no infection; 1 = infection on branches; 2 = infection on mainstem with little effect on pod fill; 3 = infection on mainstem resulting in death or poor pod fill. There was very little disease pressure with a disease index ranging from (0.6 to 1.4) in AG2733 and (0.5 to 1.3) in AG28x9. There was no significant difference in yield among treatments for either variety.

Current work:
Field trials will be repeated in 2020 to evaluate additional growing environments to understand how cover crops may influence soybean diseases. In Fall 2019, we identified 6 field locations for the 2020 growing season and sowed fall cover crops in October 2019. Our 2020 locations will include SDS and IDC fields at Kanawha, IA; one SDS and two IDC fields in the Ames area; and a white mold study at Nashua, IA. Fall cover crops included oats (broadcast into standing crops), winter rye and winter wheat (drilled immediately after 2019 harvest). Spring-sown companion oats and rye will be drilled when soybeans are planted in spring 2020.


Objective 2. Identify simple, rapid, and cost-effective bioassays to test efficacy of additional cover crop species on disease suppression in controlled environment conditions

We continued to conduct greenhouse experiments to test the ability of different cover crop amendments (rye, oat, alfalfa, clover and corn) to suppress SDS and other soilborne pathogens. In 2019 we conducted several experiments with SDS. Pasteurized field soil was amended with green manures of the cover crops and infested with spores of F. virguliforme. The soil was then incubated for three weeks, after which soybean seeds were planted. Soybean plants were sampled 14 days after planting to assess the treatment effects on root rot severity and growth, and at 28 days after planting to assess root rot and foliar symptoms. In all experimental runs, we observed a significant reduction of root rot in soybean grown in soil amended with all the green manure treatments compared to the un-amended control. Suppression with oat and rye amendments tended to be greater than with alfalfa. These results showed that soil amendment with green crop residues reduces the risk of infection by F. virguliforme, and that the level of suppression may vary across cover crop species.

Current work: After developing protocols and conducting several experiments with F. virguliforme, we are not conducting similar experiments with F. acuminatum and P. sylvaticum. These experiments will inform us if the suppression caused by the cover crop green manures also occurs with a broader range of pathogens.


Objective 3. Identify cover crops with the most potential for inhibiting pathogen growth and sporulation in vitro and survival in soil.

We conducted lab experiments to determine the effects of cover crop extracts on in-vitro growth and sporulation of F. virguliforme, F. graminearum and P. sylvaticum. Culture media was amended with plant extracts from oats, rye, alfalfa, clover, soybean, and corn. Media with no crop amendment was used as a control. Fv colony growth and sporulation were assessed on the different amended media after 2 weeks. With Fv, we found that spore production was increased by alfalfa, clover, corn and rye but not by oat amendments. With F. graminearum, mycelial growth was not affected by oat, clover or alfalfa but was slightly reduced by rye. With P. sylvaticum, mycelial growth was increased by rye, clover and alfalfa but was not affected by rye. These results suggest that green cover crop residues provide nutrients that stimulate growth and sporulation of some pathogens but in general do not have a strong inhibitory effect.

We have also started petri dish assays to examine the impact of cover crop extracts on P. sylvaticum, F. acuminatum, and F. virguliforme. Oat and rye extracts were obtained by both a tea and slurry method. Cover crop extracts in the tea method were finely chopped and placed within a tea bag, which was set in 30 mL of water and refrigerated overnight. Slurry extracts were obtained by grinding cover crops in a blender or mortar and pestle with 30 mL of water and then centrifuged. Cover crops extracts were then placed one one side of a petri dish in either a well or on soaked filter paper discs. One plug of each pathogen was placed at the opposite end of the petri dish. Each assay was run twice and water was used as a control. The growth pattern of the pathogens was observed daily to determine if a zone of inhibition could be detected. This would have indicated that the extracts were negatively affecting growth. Our results showed that oat or rye extracts have no effect on P. sylvaticum. However, the growth of F. acuminatum appears slightly altered by rye extracts. Further work is needed to confirm these results.

In a second in vitro assay, we tested if rye and oat extracts affected spore germination. Spores of F. virguliforme and F. acuminatum were added to cover crop extracts. A droplet of spore suspension was placed onto glass cover slips and placed in incubated for 6 hrs. Droplets were then allowed to dry and then stained with .15% aniline blue in lacto phenol. Slides were then viewed under a microscope to quantify germination rate. We found that both oat and rye accelerated F. virguliforme spore germination compared to water. Results for F. acuminatum are being collected.

Current work: We will continue to conduct in-vitro assays to determine how cover crops affect pathogen growth in Fusarium and Pythium species. In addition, we will conduct experiments with the white mold pathogen, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. We will soak sclerotia formed by this pathogen in cover crop tea and slurry, and then test if this affects germination of the sclerotia. All experiments will be repeated and results summarized in future reports.

Objective 4. Establish soilborne pathogen baseline data for testing the use of cover crops for precision
management of soil health.

Recently, some growers have suggested that soybeans grown over drainage tiles have higher levels of disease pressure than soybeans growing between tile lines. In 2018, we conducted a preliminary study and we obtained more F. virguliforme isolates and higher SCN counts from soil samples taken over tile lines than between lines. In 2019, we expanded the study to more fields and did a more extensive sampling. Four tiled fields in northwest Iowa were evaluated when visual signs of SDS were noticeable. Aerial images, plant samples, and soil samples were collected from areas over drainage tiles and areas between the drainage tiles. Soybean roots were plated to assess frequency of infection and soil samples were submitted to Pattern Ag for nutrient and microbial profiling.

Root isolations showed F. virguliforme was present in 76% of the root pieces of plants sampled over drainage tiles and in 60% of root pieces from plants sampled from areas between the drainage tiles. We are awaiting results from Pattern Ag to compare microbial communities and soil nutrients over and between tile lines. We are also obtaining SCN counts from the Tylka lab.

Current work: In 2020, we will analyze the 2019 data from Pattern AG, image analysis, and SCN counts, and we will repeat the study on more field.



View uploaded report Word file

More growers are utilizing cover crops in the Midwest, but the impact of cover crop practices on plant diseases is poorly understood. Cover crop plantings can alter soil moisture levels and microbial communities, and consequently may influence the development of soil-borne diseases. Sudden death syndrome (SDS), white mold (WM), and iron deficiency chlorosis (IDC) are soil-borne diseases that affect soybean production in Iowa. In the North Central region, fall-sown rye and wheat are two winter-hardy options growers can use for erosion and weed control outside of the growing season. Research in Minnesota has shown that oats, sown as a nurse crop in the spring, can mitigate IDC symptoms in soybean by taking up excess soil moisture and nitrates.
In 2019, we conducted field experiments to evaluate the effects of winter rye, winter wheat, and nurse-crop oat cover crops on development of SDS, WM, IDC, and soybean yield. We also conducted greenhouse and lab experiments to determine how cover crops affect disease development and pathogen growth. In addition, we sampled grower fields with tile drainage system to determine if disease pressure is affected by the location of the tile lines.

Objective 1. Evaluate the effect of cover crops and green manures on SDS, Fusarium root rot, white mold and iron deficiency chlorosis in field conditions

In 2019, we collected data from five fields in Iowa. Winter rye and winter wheat seed drilled late in Fall 2018 emerged early in spring 2019; oats drilled late in Fall 2018 did not emerge. Oats and rye were also established as companion crops when soybeans were planted in Spring 2019. Two soybean varieties were planted at all five locations: Asgrow AG2733 (susceptible to iron deficiency chlorosis (IDC) and sudden death syndrome (SDS)) and Asgrow 28X9 (tolerant to both diseases). Cover crops were terminated when soybeans reached the V3 growth stage. Iron chlorosis and SDS symptoms were assessed throughout the growing season. White mold incidence and severity were evaluated at growth stage R6. Soybeans were harvested in late Fall due to excessive moisture in the soil.

In general, disease pressure was very low in all trials, probably due to the unusual weather conditions in 2019. In most field trials, cover crop treatments did not consistently affect disease levels or yield. Details of each trial are shown below.

Kanawha, Iowa
IDC symptoms were observed at low levels in the field with a history of IDC, but there were no treatment differences in IDC disease severity or yield for either variety. SDS foliar disease symptoms developed late in the growing season at both locations and severity remained low until the end of the season. At the SDS location, AG28X9 plots without cover crops had higher yields than plots with cover crops, but yields for all four treatments were similar at the IDC location. Yields for AG2733 were not affected by treatment at either location.

Ames, Iowa
Two field locations were selected in central Iowa in 2019 (ISU Curtiss Farm & Hinds Farm). Hinds farm had very low disease pressure in both varieties. Curtiss farm had higher disease incidence levels in the moderately-susceptible variety than in the SDS-tolerant variety. Regardless, there was no treatment difference on SDS at either location. IDC at the Curtiss farm was low for both varieties. Yield at the Curtiss farm tended to be lowest for the Fall rye treatment. The no cover crop treatment had higher yield in the AG2733 variety, whereas fall wheat was the highest yielding plot in AG28x9.

Nashua, Iowa
One field experiment was established in northeast Iowa at the Nashua Research Farm to test cover crop impact on white mold. Disease scoring was conducted on a 0-3 scale with a select number of plants: 0 = no infection; 1 = infection on branches; 2 = infection on mainstem with little effect on pod fill; 3 = infection on mainstem resulting in death or poor pod fill. There was very little disease pressure with a disease index ranging from (0.6 to 1.4) in AG2733 and (0.5 to 1.3) in AG28x9. There was no significant difference in yield among treatments for either variety.

Current work:
Field trials will be repeated in 2020 to evaluate additional growing environments to understand how cover crops may influence soybean diseases. In Fall 2019, we identified 6 field locations for the 2020 growing season and sowed fall cover crops in October 2019. Our 2020 locations will include SDS and IDC fields at Kanawha, IA; one SDS and two IDC fields in the Ames area; and a white mold study at Nashua, IA. Fall cover crops included oats (broadcast into standing crops), winter rye and winter wheat (drilled immediately after 2019 harvest). Spring-sown companion oats and rye will be drilled when soybeans are planted in spring 2020.



Objective 2. Identify simple, rapid, and cost-effective bioassays to test efficacy of additional cover crop species on disease suppression in controlled environment conditions

We continued to conduct greenhouse experiments to test the ability of different cover crop amendments (rye, oat, alfalfa, clover and corn) to suppress SDS and other soilborne pathogens. In 2019 we conducted several experiments with SDS. Pasteurized field soil was amended with green manures of the cover crops and infested with spores of F. virguliforme. The soil was then incubated for three weeks, after which soybean seeds were planted. Soybean plants were sampled 14 days after planting to assess the treatment effects on root rot severity and growth, and at 28 days after planting to assess root rot and foliar symptoms. In all experimental runs, we observed a significant reduction of root rot in soybean grown in soil amended with all the green manure treatments compared to the un-amended control. Suppression with oat and rye amendments tended to be greater than with alfalfa. These results showed that soil amendment with green crop residues reduces the risk of infection by F. virguliforme, and that the level of suppression may vary across cover crop species.

Current work: After developing protocols and conducting several experiments with F. virguliforme, we are now conducting similar experiments with F. acuminatum and P. sylvaticum. These experiments will inform us if the suppression caused by the cover crop green manures also occurs with a broader range of pathogens.

Objective 3. Identify cover crops with the most potential for inhibiting pathogen growth and sporulation in vitro and survival in soil.

We conducted lab experiments to determine the effects of cover crop extracts on in-vitro growth and sporulation of F. virguliforme, F. graminearum and P. sylvaticum. Culture media was amended with plant extracts from oats, rye, alfalfa, clover, soybean, and corn. Media with no crop amendment was used as a control. Fv colony growth and sporulation were assessed after 2 weeks. With Fv, we found that spore production was increased by alfalfa, clover, corn and rye but not by oat amendments. With F. graminearum, mycelial growth was not affected by oat, clover or alfalfa but was slightly reduced by rye. With P. sylvaticum, mycelial growth was increased by rye, clover and alfalfa but was not affected by rye. These results suggest that green cover crop residues provide nutrients that stimulate growth and sporulation of some pathogens but in general do not have a strong inhibitory effect.

We have also started petri dish assays to examine the impact of cover crop extracts on P. sylvaticum, F. acuminatum, and F. virguliforme. Oat and rye extracts were added to petri dishes where the pathogens were grown. The growth pattern of the pathogens was observed daily to determine if a zone of inhibition could be detected. This would have indicated that the extracts were negatively affecting growth. Our results showed that oat or rye extracts have no effect on P. sylvaticum. However, the growth of F. acuminatum appears slightly altered by rye extracts. Further work is needed to confirm these results.

In a second in vitro assay, we tested if rye and oat extracts affected spore germination. Spores of F. virguliforme and F. acuminatum were added to cover crop extracts and observed under the microscope after 6 hours of incubation. We found that both oat and rye accelerated F. virguliforme spore germination compared to water. Results for F. acuminatum are being collected.

Current work: We will continue to conduct in-vitro assays to determine how cover crops affect pathogen growth in Fusarium and Pythium species. In addition, we will conduct experiments with the white mold pathogen, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. We will soak sclerotia formed by this pathogen in cover crop tea and slurry, and then test if this affects germination of the sclerotia. All experiments will be repeated and results summarized in future reports.

Objective 4. Establish soilborne pathogen baseline data for testing the use of cover crops for precision
management of soil health.

Recently, some growers have suggested that soybeans grown over drainage tiles have higher levels of disease pressure than soybeans growing between tile lines. In 2018, we conducted a preliminary study and we obtained more F. virguliforme isolates and higher SCN counts from soil samples taken over tile lines than between lines. In 2019, we expanded the study to more fields and did a more extensive sampling. Four tiled fields in northwest Iowa were evaluated when visual signs of SDS were noticeable. Aerial images, plant samples, and soil samples were collected from areas over drainage tiles and areas between the drainage tiles. Soybean roots were plated to assess frequency of infection and soil samples were submitted to Pattern Ag for nutrient and microbial profiling.

Root isolations showed F. virguliforme was present in 76% of the root pieces of plants sampled over drainage tiles and in 60% of root pieces from plants sampled from areas between the drainage tiles. We are awaiting results from Pattern Ag to compare microbial communities and soil nutrients over and between tile lines. We are also obtaining SCN counts from the Tylka lab.

Current work: In 2020, we will analyze the 2019 data from Pattern AG, image analysis, and SCN counts, and we will repeat the study on more field.



The United Soybean Research Retention policy will display final reports with the project once completed but working files will be purged after three years. And financial information after seven years. All pertinent information is in the final report or if you want more information, please contact the project lead at your state soybean organization or principal investigator listed on the project.