Our primary goal here is to answer the question (and title of the proposal): do soil health promoting practices make soybean production more climate resilient?
We will leverage the ISA-funded (FY 2022) precipitation exclusion, application systems (PEAS) to test specifically soybean physiological response to future climate scenarios. Climate models predict wetter springs (>15 %) and more variable summer precipitation that will include more droughty summers (NOAA National Climate Assessment, 2023). Our intent is to add 20% precipitation to ambient rainfall between months of April through June 21, and thereafter remove 50% precipitation until end of September. This will simulate a ’worse-case’ future precipitation (FP) scenario with wetter springs making it more difficult to get in the field, and drier summer mimicking soybean-limited soil moisture conditions that may occur more frequently in the future. We will have an ambient precipitation (AP) and FP sub-plots within a long-term (22 years), randomized, replicated trial crop rotation experiment – the Marsden Agricultural Diversity Experiment (MADE) – that has three rotations: corn-soybean plus synthetic N fertilizer (2-year), corn-soybeans-oat/redclover (3-year), and corns-soybean-oat/alfalfa-alfalfa plus composted cattle manure (4-year). Prior research from PI-McDaniel’s group, Soil Health Institute, and others have documented the many soil health benefits from the 4-year rotation compared to the 2-year. We will focus on comparing whether these increases in soil health translate to more climate resilience in 4-year rotation compared to the 2-year. In other words, does improving soil health buffer soybean yields against these changes in precipitation?